J. M. LANIER, APPELLANT,

v.

DELL H. HUCKEBY, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• State v. Burris, 875 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 2004)
  …do not address Burris’s claim regarding the failure of the information as filed to track the language of the statute. It is so ordered. ANSTEAD, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, and CANTERO, JJ., concur. . See, e.g., Williamson v. State, 92 Fla. 980, 111 So. 124 (1926) (aggravated assault); City of Coral Springs v. Forfeiture of a 1997 Ford Ranger Pickup Truck, 803 So. 2d 847 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002) (aggravated battery). .The State made a similar legislative intent argument in Overstreet v. State,…
• Donaldson v. State, 369 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
  …n direct but withheld her testimony until the final stage of the trial. We recognize the principle that the trial judge may in the exercise of sound discretion allow proper rebuttal evidence, even if it appears to be cumulative. Williamson v. State, 92 Fla. 980, 111 So. 124 (1926). But in this case the testimony of the wife on rebuttal as to the problems that she had with appellant was not proper to rebut the appellant’s character for violence, inasmuch as he had never put his good character or reputation…
• Valease Jackson v. State, 662 So. 2d 1369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …m, after which the victim’s wallet was taken as he lay at the side of the road, seriously injured. There is no question but that a motor vehicle may qualify as a “deadly weapon” if used as was the automobile in this case. E.g., Williamson v. State, 92 Fla. 980, 111 So. 124 (1926); McCullers v. State, 206 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 210 So. 2d 868 (Fla.1968); Solitro v. State, 165 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964). Appellant does not argue to the contrary. Rather, as in the trial court, he contends…