J.K.P., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2000-07-07
No. 2D99-2155
ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.
764 So. 2d 756 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that amending a charging petition to allege a new, more serious offense after the presentation of evidence violates due process.


Facts & Procedural History

The State initially charged J.K.P. with assault. After the State presented its evidence, it orally amended the charge to aggravated assault. J.K.P. wa…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BLUE, Judge.

BLUE, Judge.

J.K.P. appeals his adjudication for aggravated assault. Because J.K.P. was denied due process by the State’s amendment to the charging petition, we reverse the adjudication.

The State proceeded to an adjudicatory hearing on an amended petition alleging that J.K.P. had committed the offense of assault. Following the presentation of evidence, the State orally amended the charge to aggravated assault. Under the facts of this case, it was fundamental error for the trial court to permit the State to amend and charge a new offense subsequent to the presentation of its evidence. “[Ajmendment is permissible when it merely clarifies some detail of the existing charge and could not reasonably have caused the defendant any prejudice. There is a significant difference, however, between amending a charged offense and the filing of a new and entirely different offense.” Green v. State, 728 So. 2d 779, 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). The State cannot charge and try a criminal defendant for a misdemeanor and then convict that defendant of a felony, even in juvenile court.

Accordingly, we vacate the adjudication for aggravated assault. As the evidence presented at the adjudicatory hearing supported an adjudication on the tried offense, assault, we direct the trial court to enter an adjudication for that offense. In light of the disposition imposed on this and several other charges, a new disposition hearing is not required.

Adjudication of delinquency vacated and case remanded with directions.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw