BROWARD COUNTY, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT SEITZ, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-07-26
No. 3D00-794
Before JORGENSON and SORONDO, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.
764 So. 2d 819 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that venue for actions against a county lies in the county of its principal headquarters, absent waiver.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff sued Broward County and other defendants for damages arising from three separate automobile accidents. Broward County asserted its home venu…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Broward County appeals from a nonfinal order denying its motion to sever, bifurcate, or transfer this case to Broward County. For the following reasons, we reverse.

In Dade Circuit Court, plaintiff Robert Seitz sued Jossey Bareille, a resident of Miami-Dade County; Lucille Daughtry, also a resident of Miami-Dade County; Broward County; and GEICO Insurance. The action was for damages for injuries arising from three separate and completely unrelated automobile accidents. The accident with Bareille occurred in Miami in March 1996. In April 1996, plaintiff was driving in Broward County when his car was hit by a vehicle owned by Broward County, being driven on County business. The accident with Daughtry happened in Dade County in January 1998.1

Broward answered and, in an affirmative defense, asserted its home venue privilege. The County moved to sever, bifurcate, and transfer the action against Broward to Broward County. Plaintiff had not sued Broward as a joint tortfeasor. The trial court denied the County’s motions; the County appeals.

Venue in civil actions brought against the state or one of its agencies or subdivisions, absent waiver or exception, properly lies in the county where the state, agency, or subdivision maintains its principal headquarters. See Carlile v. Game & Fresh Water Fish Comm’n, 354 So. 2d 362 (Fla.1977). The County asserted its home venue privilege in its Answer and never expressly or impliedly waived that privilege. Accordingly, the trial court shall sever the Broward County action from the other two cases, and transfer it to the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit.

In oral argument, plaintiff requested that this court certify this question to the supreme court. We decline to do so, and reverse and remand with directions.

REVERSED.

. Plaintiff's claim against GEICO was for uninsured motorist benefits.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw