JAMES MAJOR, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JAMES MAJOR, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
764 So. 2d 870
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation and his sentence. See Brawn v. State, 659 So. 2d 1260, 1261 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). However, we remand this cause for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation. See Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943, 945 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).
AFFIRMED but REMANDED.
DELL, GUNTHER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wiggins v. Est. OF April Brown Wright, 850 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 2003)…proposed by Wright. As I have indicated, in my opinion, these facts establish that a conflict of interest developed over the allotment of the proceeds of the settlement amount. I, therefore, believe that the decisions in Perris v. Estate of Perris, 764 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) and [In re Estate of Catapane, 759 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)] should control the disposition of the issue concerning the allotment of attorneys fees between Nichols and Schwichtenberg. Application of the formula adopted in Cat…1 / 2
-
Wagner, Vaughan, McLAUGHLIN & Brennan, P.A. v. Kennedy LAW Grp., 64 So. 3d 1187 (Fla. 2011)…tained by counsel. See, e.g., Wiggins v. Estate of Wright, 850 So. 2d 444, 445 (Fla.2003) (applying section 768.26 in a wrongful death case where counsel “negotiated a settlement of the estate’s claim with the hospital”); Perris v. Estate of Perris, 764 So. 2d 870, 870-71 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (stating that the case “concerns the computation of attorney’s fees in a wrongful death action” where the “ease was settled for the total policy limits of $125,000”); In re Estate of Catapane, 759 So. 2d 9, 10 (Fla. 4th D…
-
Brittany and Marquis Wiggins v. The Est. OF April Brown Wright, 786 So. 2d 1247 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…proposed by Wright. As I have indicated, in my opinion, these facts establish that a conflict of interest developed over the allotment of the proceeds of the settlement amount. I, therefore, believe that the decisions in Perris v. Estate of Perris, 764 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) and Catapane should control the disposition of the issue concerning the allotment of attorneys fees between Nichols and Schwichtenberg. Application of the formula adopted in Catapane would obviously allot the larger portion of th…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Donley v. State, 557 So. 2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
- Brown v. State, 659 So. 2d 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995)