BRIAN CRAIG STRANGE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BRIAN CRAIG STRANGE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
764 So. 2d 919
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant Brian Craig Strange’s judgment and sentence. See Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla.2000); Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000); Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979). We do not address the State’s ineffective assistance of appellate counsel argument raised in the answer brief because this issue is not ripe for consideration. Cf. Messina v. State, 563 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (issue concerning what sentences might be imposed if the appellant were to violate probation was not ripe for review).
WOLF, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cavaco v. State, 765 So. 2d 985 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…court’s oral pronouncements. Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000). The state’s argument regarding appellant’s ability to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature and not ripe for consideration. Strange v. State, 764 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.…
-
Hutchinson v. State, 769 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Strange v. State, 764 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). ERVIN, MINER and KAHN, JJ, CONCUR.…
Authorities Cited
- Gissendanner v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1979)
- Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)
- Leonard v. State, 760 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 2000)
- Messina v. State, 563 So. 2d 194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)