JACK VANDERBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHAEL W. MOORE, ET AL., APPELLEES
JACK VANDERBERG, APPELLANT,
MICHAEL W. MOORE, ET AL., APPELLEES
765 So. 2d 94
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The trial court should not have dismissed appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus without specifying which documents appellant failed to supply in his previous filings under section 57.085(7), Florida Statutes (1997). See Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Gosman v. Moore, 745 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).
REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 745 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)
- Bandy v. Sheffield, 751 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)
- Williams v. Williams, 751 So. 2d 164 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)