NAUSHAD HUSSAIN AND RAANA NAUSHAD, APPELLANTS,
v.
WINN DIXIE STORES, INC., APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Raana Naushad slipped on a raw egg in a Winn Dixie store and sued for negligence. The trial court granted summary judgment for Winn Dixie, finding insufficient evidence of actual or constructive notice of the dangerous condition. The appellate court affirmed, holding that Winn Dixie's thirty-minute floor inspection policy and testimony that floors were mopped 15-20 minutes before the fall precluded liability as a matter of law.
Summary judgment for Winn Dixie was properly entered because there was insufficient evidence, circumstantial or otherwise, to create a material issue of fact that the egg had been on the floor so long that Winn Dixie should be charged with negligence for failing to discover and clean it up.
[1] A storekeeper owes a duty to exercise ordinary care to keep the premises, including approaches, reasonably safe for use by customers.
[2] To recover in a slip and fall case, a plaintiff must demonstrate either actual notice of the dangerous condition or that the condition existed for a sufficient length of…
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“was there any proof, circumstantial or otherwise, sufficient to create a material issue of fact to show that the egg had been overlooked and left on the floor for such a long time that the store should be charged with negligence because it did not discover and clean it up earlier?”
Articulates the constructive notice standard applicable to slip-and-fall cases in supermarkets.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRaana Naushad slipped on a raw egg in the middle of an aisle in front of the dairy case at Winn Dixie shortly before closing time. The store was nearl…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Slip And Fall cases and more on FLexlaw
Raana Naushad, who slipped and fell in a Winn Dixie store, and her husband, ap peal from a final summary judgment m favor of Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. The trial judge concluded, based on the pleadings and depositions of record, that there was insufficient evidence to establish actual notice or constructive notice on the part of Winn Dixie that the item causing Raana’s fall was on the floor of the store. We affirm.
Because this is a summary judgment, we must look at the record in a manner most favorable to Raana’s position.1 Raana was shopping with her two younger children in a Winn Dixie store shortly before closing time (9:00 p.m. or so). The store was almost empty of customers. She stepped on a raw egg that had been dropped in the middle of an aisle in the store, in front of the dairy case, where she was intending to purchase some butter. Her feet slipped out from under her and she fell on her back, hitting her head. No one saw her actually fall, and no one had any idea about how the egg came to be dropped in the middle of the aisle.
Because there was no proof or suggestion that a store employee caused the egg to fall where it was, or that Raana did, or that anyone actually saw the egg before Raana fell, the issue in this case was whether Winn Dixie, through its store employees, could be charged with constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Marcotte, 553 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989).
That is, was there any proof, circumstantial or otherwise, sufficient to create a material issue of fact to show that the egg had been overlooked and left on the floor for such a long time that the store should be charged with negligence because it did not discover and clean it up earlier? See Montgomery v. Florida Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So. 2d 302 (Fla.1973); Colon v. Outback Steakhouse of Florida, Inc., 721 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998); Silver Springs Moose Lodge No. 1199 v. Orman, 631 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 621 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Ress v. X-tra Super Food Centers, Inc., 616 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Washington v. Pic-N-Pay Supermarket, Inc., 453 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984).
Winn Dixie’s assistant manager and store clerk testified in their depositions that Winn Dixie had a policy of inspecting the store floors every thirty minutes, and that on the night of Raana’s fall the floors of the whole store were mopped at least thirty minutes before 'she fell, and more likely fifteen to twenty minutes before. Raana was able to show very little to counter their statements.
Raana’s children said there were a lot of eggs splattered around, and that they looked “dirty.” Apparently a carton of eggs had broken open'and more than one fell out. All but one of the eggs fell in or near a drink display, and were not the cause of the fall. The photographs of the accident site and the Winn Dixie employees’ testimonies make that clear. There was testimony that the egg splatter showed evidence of a one foot track running through it, and some dirt.
However, Raana had stepped in the egg, and her shopping cart had also tracked through it. There was no evidence that there were additional step marks or tracks, or that the yolk of the egg had crusted and “aged” through being left on the floor a long time. The assistant manager testified the egg was fresh and runny, and no one disputed that fact.
AFFIRMED.
THOMPSON, C.J. and GRIFFIN, J„ concur. . Venezia v. Egan, 671 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 680 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1996); Med-Star Cent., Inc. v. Psychiatric Hospitals of Hernando County, Inc., 639 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994); Destiny Construction Co. v. Martin K. Eby Construction, 662 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor v. Universal City Prop. Mgmt., 779 So. 2d 621 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…o. 2d 368 (Fla.1979); Venezia v. Egan, 671 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 680 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1996); Watson v. Hahn, 664 So. 2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). . Turner v. PCR, Inc., 754 So. 2d 683 (Fla.2000); Hussain v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 765 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Foster v. Po Folks, Inc., 674 So. 2d 843 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).…
-
Duncan v. Kasim, Inc., 810 So. 2d 968 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)…irm the balance of the summary judgment. AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED. PALMER and ORFINGER, R.B., JJ., concur. . See Dr. Phillips, Inc. v. L & W Supply Corp., 790 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Hussain v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 765 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). . That statute prohibits a person who has been convicted of a felony in the last five years from being employed as a bartender, person in charge or manager in a liquor lounge licensed by the Division of Alcoholic Beverages and…
Authorities Cited (11 total)
- Montgomery v. Fla. Jitney Jungle Stores, Inc., 281 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 1973)
- Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Marcotte, 553 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
- Woods v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., 621 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993)
- Destiny Constr. Co. v. Martin K. EBY Constr., 662 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
- Colon v. Outback Steakhouse OF Fla., Inc., 721 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)
- Merian v. Merhige, 671 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)
- Venezia v. Egan, 671 So. 2d 175 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
- Ress v. X-Tra Super Food Ctrs., Inc., 616 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
- Silver Springs Moose Lodge NO. 1199 v. Orman, 631 So. 2d 1119 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)
- Ruthie Mae Washington v. Pic-N-Pay Supermarket, Inc., 453 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)