FLORIDA WORKERS' COMPENSATION JOINT UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION AND TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
RICHARD MUNDELL AND COUNTYWIDE TREE SERVICE, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-06-26
No. 1D99-1837
WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.
765 So. 2d 151 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Caution
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the workers' compensation insurance policy cancellation was invalid because FWCJUA failed to follow its own rules and accepted a premium payment after issuing the cancellation notice.


Facts & Procedural History

FWCJUA attempted to cancel Countywide Tree Service's workers' compensation policy for failure to submit a quarterly earnings report. The claimant was …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, J.

ERVIN, J.

Appellants, insurance carrier Florida Workers’ Compensation Joint Underwriting Association (FWCJUA) and its servicing agent, Travelers Indemnity Company, appeal an order finding that the employer, Countywide Tree Service, was covered by workers’ compensation insurance on October 23, 1995, when claimant, Richard Mun-dell, was injured on the job. Appellants contend that the judge of compensation claims (JCC) erred in concluding that FWCJUA’s notice of cancellation was inadequate, in deciding that cancellation was invalid under FWCJUA’s rules and procedures, and in applying the doctrine of estoppel. We affirm.

It is undisputed that FWCJUA terminated Countywide’s workers’ compensation policy for the reason that Countywide had failed to submit a quarterly earnings report required by section 440.381(4), Florida Statutes (1993). We have carefully reviewed the provisions authorizing cancellation of policies in FWCJUA’s bylaws, Operating Manual, Service Provider Agreement, and Producer Manual, and agree with the JCC that none of the provisions appellants rely upon authorized termination of coverage based simply upon a failure to submit the quarterly tax report. FWCJUA thus failed to meet its burden of proving cancellation in accordance with its policy provisions. See Cat ‘N Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Ins. Co., 213 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1968).

Moreover, we agree that FWCJUA was estopped from asserting cancellation of coverage, because it accepted Countywide’s premium payment on September 8, 1995, after it had issued the notice of .cancellation on August 29, 1995, to be effective October 3, 1995. See Peninsular Life Ins. Co. v. Howard, 72 So. 2d 389 (Fla.1954).

Because FWCJUA’s cancellation was invalid for each of the reasons stated above, we do not reach the issue of the adequacy of notice.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF and WEBSTER, JJ., CONCUR.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …knowledge that an appeal of an order finding that the employer’s workers’ compensation policy was in effect on the date of the claimant’s injury was entertained by the court in Florida Workers’ Compensation Joint Underwriting Association v. Mundell, 765 So. 2d 151 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). However, that fact is not determinative of the jurisdictional issue, since that issue is not addressed in the court’s opinion, nor is it clear that any matters other than the coverage issue were pending before the Judge of Compe…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw