ANTHONY RICHARDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 2000-07-26
No. 2D99-2338
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and ISOM, CLAUDIA R., Associate Judge, Concur.
765 So. 2d 223 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Anthony Richardson’s convictions but remand with directions that condition (28) of the order of probation be stricken because the trial court orally pronounced that court costs, as well as attorney’s fees, would not be made a condition of probation but would be reduced to a lien.

Affirmed, but remanded for correction of probation order. CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and WHATLEY, J., and ISOM, CLAUDIA R., Associate Judge, Concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc., 807 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
    …timely perfected within twenty days is subject to dismissal pursuant to Florida Administrative Code Rule 38E 3.006.2 As the appellees correctly point out, there are no good cause exceptions to this dismissal rule. See Creech v. Orlando Leasing Sys., 765 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Linderman v. K.B. Beach Suites, Ltd. PRT, 751 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Delgado v. Concentrated Chem. Co., 644 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Florida State University v. Jenkins, 323 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Where, h…
  • Trisha L. Frederick v. Florida Unemployment Appeals, 834 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …jurisdiction. Fla. Admin. Code R. 60BB-7.006. As the UAC correctly points out, there are no good cause exceptions provided either in the statute or rule. See Espinosa v. Cableoptics, 807 So. 2d 195 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Creech v. Orlando Leasing Sys., 765 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). However, “in certain individual cases based on considerations of fairness and due process,” appellate courts have carved out exceptions to the dismissal rule. Applegate v. National Health Care Affiliates, Inc., 667 So. 2d 332, 33…
  • Osiel Guerrero v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Unicity Imports Corp., 855 So. 2d 266 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
    …ys subjects a claim to dismissal under Florida Administrative Code Rule 60BB-7.006. There are no good cause exceptions to this dismissal rule. See Espinosa v. Cableoptics, Inc., 807 So. 2d 195, 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Creech v. Orlando Leasing Sys., 765 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Linderman v. K.B. Beach Suites, Ltd. PTR, 751 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Delgado v. Concentrated Chem. Co., 644 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Florida State University v. Jenkins, 323 So. 2d 597 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). Where, h…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw