FRED REUBEN CLARKE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRED REUBEN CLARKE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
765 So. 2d 726
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1999)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We find appellant’s first two issues to be without merit and affirm them without discussion. On the third issue, we also affirm but certify the same question of great public importance as in Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D831 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), review granted, No. 95,281, 740 So. 2d 529 (Fla. Aug. 23, 1999):
DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POW ERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
AFFIRMED; question certified.
BARFIELD, C.J., MINER and ALLEN, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Clarke v. State, 777 So. 2d 971 (Fla. 2001)…LEWIS, J. We have for review the decision in Clarke v. State, 765 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), in which the First District certified the same question as in Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), approved sub nom. State v. Cotton, 769 So. 2d 845 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Co…
Authorities Cited
- Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)