ANTWAN WOODSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Antwan Woodson appeals the trial court’s order which denied his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. Woodson alleged that he did not receive proper jail credits in case number 96-19201.
Because the judgments and sentences reflect that the trial court awarded the proper amount of jail credit, we affirm. However, because there may be a problem with the amount of jail credit actually credited to Woodson by the Department of Corrections in case number 96-19201, our affirmance is without prejudice to Wood-son seeking a proper award of jail credits through the administrative channels of the Department of Corrections.
PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
GEICO Indem. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 79 So. 3d 55 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011)…nd its existing policies, or create new ones, to incorporate a fee schedule that is already incorporated by law and by reference into the insureds’ policies is contrary to Florida law. See Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. R & J Crane Serv., Inc., 765 So. 2d 836, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“Generally, all existing applicable or relevant and valid statutes, ordinances, regulations, and settled law of the land at the time a contract is made become a part of it and must be read into it just as if an express prov…
-
Life Care Ponte Vedra, Inc. v. H.K. WU, 162 So. 3d 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015)…ade become a part of it and must be read into it just as if an express provision to that effect were inserted therein, except where the contract discloses a contrary intention.” See, e.g., Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. R & J Crane Serv., Inc., 765 So. 2d 836, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (citing 17A. Am.Jur.2d Contracts § 381 (1991)). Thus, the trial court’s analysis was faulty to the extent that it found the statute "of little value” because "nowhere in the Contract does it state that occupancy therein will…
-
GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Virtual Imaging Servs., Inc., 90 So. 3d 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2012)…mend its existing policies, or create new ones, to incorporate a fee schedule that is already incorporated by law and by reference into the insured’s policy is contrary to Florida law. See Northbrook Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. R & J Crane Serv., Inc., 765 So. 2d 836, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“Generally, all existing applicable or relevant and valid statutes, ordinances, regulations, and settled law of the land at the time a contract is made become a part of it and must be read into it just as if an express prov…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence