BOOKER T. JONES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse 1994 Sentencing Guidelines cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief alleging his right to be resentenced under the 1994 sentencing guidelines.
The Supreme Court of Florida has recently held the operative window period in which to challenge the sentencing guideline provisions amended by Chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, commenced on October 1, -1995, and ended oh May 24, 1997, see Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2000). We agree with Judge Altenbernd’s analysis in Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), on the need to remand such cases for a recalculation of the defendant’s sentences under the 1994 guidelines scoresheet.
We reverse the order denying 3.850 relief and remand for consideration of whether resentencing is required pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000). See also Speed v. State, 764 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
STEVENSON, SHAHOOD and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Largie v. Michael Gregorian, M.D., 913 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…merits”); see also McPherson v. Phillips, 877 So. 2d 755, 760 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)(noting that the statute of limitations “circumscribefs] the trial court’s discretion in dealing with a [claim of] Chapter 766 noncompliance”); Tapia-Ruano v. Alvarez, 765 So. 2d 942, 943-44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(affirming dismissal where the statute of limitations had run and plaintiff provided no reason for failure to comply with the presuit requirements); Central Florida Reg’l Hosp. v. Hill, 721 So. 2d 404, 406 (Fla. 5th DCA 199…
-
Anderson v. Wagner, 955 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006)…o Dr. Wagner and Associates. The Third District Court has held that a hospital's failure to provide the required expert corroboration cannot be imputed to a co-defendant from whom the claimant never requested medical records. Tapia-Ruano v. Alvarez, 765 So. 2d 942, 943-44 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Logically, the opposite would also apply. While one party may have waived its right to a medical expert opinion, this waiver is not imputed to other codefendants. Here, Mr. Anderson clearly requested medical records from…
-
Irv Cohen v. W. Boca Med. Ctr., Inc., 854 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)…utorily required information, the statute of limitations had run. We therefore conclude that, because there was no reasonable explanation for plaintiffs failure to comply with the pre-suit requirements, dismissal was proper. Tapia-Ruano v. Alvarez, 765 So. 2d 942 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(affirming dismissal where statute of limitations had run and plaintiff provided no reason for failure to comply with the presuit requirements); Royle v. Florida Hospital-East Orlando, 679 So. 2d 1209 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)(same). Af…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Xzavier Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2000)
- Smith v. State, 761 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)
- Speed v. State, 764 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)