DERIK HOSKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE CITY OF MIAMI, ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-08-16
No. 3D00-279
Before COPE, GERSTEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
766 So. 2d 410 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Mandamus is not the proper remedy for redress of Appellant Derik Hoskins’ complaints. See Davis v. City of South Bay, 433 So. 2d 1364 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw