ARTIS J. KELLY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (51 total)

• Hall v. State, 823 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 2002)
  …to a less discretionary application of sentences than that permitted prior to the Guidelines — the limitations the Guidelines place on a judge's discretion cannot violate a defendant's right to due process by reason of being vague”); Hall v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Hall v. State, 773 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). . The Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution provides as follows: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishmen…
• Hall v. State, 826 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2002)
  …PER CURIAM. We have for review Hall v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which certified a direct conflict with the decision in Victory v. State, 422 So. 2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We quash the decision in part as explained below. Hall was char…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Peterson v. State, 775 So. 2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
  …ce or as enumerated in s. 924.06(1). Appellant argues that the statute violates due process because it “dispenses with sentencing uniformity, and, therefore, violates an accused’s right to equal protection and due process of law.” In Hall v. State, 767 So. 2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), we held that the above provision did not violate due process. We adhere to Hall and therefore reject the due process argument, but address other constitutional issues which were not addressed in Hall. Appellant also argues that…

Authorities Cited

• Mills v. State, 642 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994)