DARRYL S. SPROW, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Howell M. Ramsey v. State, 965 So. 2d 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …lish that his out-of-state incarceration tolled the time for filing this motion, it shall hold further proceedings on the timeliness issue. See Lopez-Merced, 949 So. 2d at 363; Ballester v. State, 781 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Rolling v. State, 767 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Otherwise, the postconviction court shall consider the motion on the merits. Reversed and remanded as directed. WHATLEY and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.…
• Ballester v. State, 781 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether the defendant was deprived of access to Florida legal materials or whether he was represented by counsel during the relevant time period. Rolling v.. State, 755 So. 2d 184 (Fla. 3d DCA), reh’g granted, 767 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Demps v. State, 696 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.…
• Garrick John v. State, 826 So. 2d 496 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)
  …out of state for the entire time period in which to file a motion for post-conviction relief and did not have access to Florida legal materials. John’s argument is based upon Demps v. State, 696 So. 2d 1296 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) and Rolling v. State, 767 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Even though in Demps the defendant was only incarcerated in the State of Florida for approximately one month of the two-year time period for filing a rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief, we held that “the two-year time p…

Authorities Cited

• Bover v. State, 732 So. 2d 1187 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)