LAZARO TOMAS VASQUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-09-13
No. 3D00-149
Before LEVY, GERSTEN, and RAMIREZ, JJ.
767 So. 2d 609 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Smith v. State, 705 So. 2d 1033, 1034 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Isom v. State, 800 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
    …4. These issues were therefore litigated and decided [*294] on the merits and thus fail on an application of the law of the case as well as res judicata grounds. See State v. Stabile, 443 So. 2d 398, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); see also Perez v. State, 767 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Smith v. State, 669 So. 2d 1133, 1134 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996). In his next two claims, Isom contends that the trial court improperly used his habitual offender status as a reason for departure from the sentencing guidelines, and that…
  • Allen v. State, 917 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
    …petition was filed.”); Isom v. State, 800 So. 2d 292, 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(citing State v. Stabile, 443 So. 2d 398, 400 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984))(law of the case precludes relitigation of all issues necessarily ruled upon by the court); Perez v. State, 767 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Petition denied.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw