RUDY SOMINTAC, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Deportation Consequences Of Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review the decision in Somintac v. State, 748 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), which was certified to be in conflict with the opinions in Kalici v. State, 755 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), approved, 767 So. 2d 451 (Fla.2000), and Gregersen v. State, 714 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved, 758 So. 2d 106 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. This Court recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So. 2d 42 (Fla.2000), that a petition for writ of error coram nobis was the proper vehicle for raising a claim that a noncustodial defendant was not advised of the immigration consequences of a plea and that defendants have two years from the time they are threatened with deportation to file the pleading. See id. at 46. We emphasize that all such claims filed subsequent to our decision in Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla.1999), must be filed pursuant to a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Peart, 756 So. 2d at 46. Somintac is quashed as being inconsistent with our decision in Peart.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur. WELLS,-CJ., and HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., dissent.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Wood v. State, 750 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 1999)
- Roan Peart v. State, 756 So. 2d 42 (Fla. 2000)
- Knafel v. State, 714 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
- Gino Kalici v. State, 755 So. 2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- State v. Gino Kalici, 767 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2000)
- Friedrich v. State, 767 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2000)
- Somintac v. State, 748 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
- State v. Era Gregersen, 758 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2000)
- Dante Rubio v. State, 758 So. 2d 106 (Fla. 2000)