ROBIN SPLAINE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS,
v.
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ET AL., APPELLEES/RESPONDENTS
ROBIN SPLAINE, ETC., ET AL., APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS,
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ET AL., APPELLEES/RESPONDENTS
768 So. 2d 1189
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
BY ORDER OF THE COURT:
Based on the Joint Stipulation and Request for Dismissal of Appellee Tower Systems South, Inc. and Withdrawal of Opinion, the opinion filed September 20, 2000, is hereby withdrawn and dismissed as to Tower Systems South, Inc. The opinion as to the City of West Palm Beach remains in full force and effect. Affirmed. See De-Rosa v. City of West Palm Beach, 758 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Stanford v. State, 833 So. 2d 174 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…here, the defense counsel only offered a “boiler plate/bare bones” motion for judgment of acquittal at the trial below. See Stephens v. State, 787 So. 2d 747, 753 (Fla.2001); Hayes v. State, 780 So. 2d 918, 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001); Brandon v. State, 768 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); Sanders v. State, 765 So. 2d 778 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Whitfield v. Singletary, 730 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); James v. State, 745 So. 2d 1141, 1142 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Moreover, the state maintains that the error raise…
-
Baccari v. State, 145 So. 3d 958 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…related to the selection of a jury would be “waived and not preserved for appellate review where the appellant failed to either renew his objection prior to the jury being sworn or accept the jury subject to his earlier objection.” Brandon v. State, 768 So. 2d 1189, 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000). Finally, our court has stated that “it is necessary to renew an objection to a juror prior to the panel being sworn.” Glinton v. State, 956 So. 2d 497, 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (finding that the defendant failed to preserve…
-
Pacheco v. State, 784 So. 2d 459 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)…sentencing of a defendant as both a prison releasee reof-fender and a habitual felony offender does not violate the constitutional protection against double jeopardy. See Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655, 658-59 (Fla.2000)3; see also Brandon v. State, 768 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(citing Alfonso v. State, 761 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)). Accordingly, we affirm the sentence in this case. Affirmed. . At the close of the State’s case, the resisting arrest and drug paraphernalia charges were nolle prossed…