PEYTON E. HONEYCUTT, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Huntley Johnson v. Thigpen, 788 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)
  …distributed a newsletter in which the author threatened to kill the plaintiff and rape all of her children constituted conduct so outrageous in character and so extreme in degree as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency. See Nims v. Harrison, 768 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). The Florida Supreme Court has not ruled directly on the standard to apply for intentional infliction of emotional distress arising out of the workplace. However, in ruling that the workers’ compensation statute does not bar an…
• Williams v. Worldwide Flight SVCS. Inc., 877 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
  …ons reflect conduct that is reprehensible, objectionable, and offensive. The allegations, however, are alone insufficient under Florida law to support a cause of action for intentional infliction of emotional distress. Compare with Nims v. Harrison, 768 So. 2d 1198, 1199 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)(where the allegations involved, unlike here, death threats, and threats to rape the plaintiffs children and other family relatives). We also do not see how the physical activities the employer subjected Williams to were suf…
• Rapp v. Jews FOR Jesus, Inc., 944 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)
  …d for the eyes of like-minded individuals who would view the subject matter in a positive light. As appellee observes, the report “describes a pleasant and eventually joyous visit with Bruce Rapp’s family.” Edith Rapp’s reliance on Nims v. Harrison, 768 So. 2d 1198 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), is misplaced. Comparing the extreme and vile conduct in Nims to what happened here is like comparing apples to raisins. Also, Edith Rapp relies on her subjective response to the publication; however, the “subjective response of…

Authorities Cited

• Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)