RICHARD BENARD HASTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-10-18
No. 4D00-1023
WARNER, C.J., DELL and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
769 So. 2d 494 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wilson v. State, 434 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

WARNER, C.J., DELL and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Gonse v. State, 952 So. 2d 555 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
    …rd degree, punishable as provided in s. 775.082, s. 775.083, or s. 775.084. However, the fine imposed for such fourth or subsequent violation may be not less than $1,000. This section makes a fine for this DUI offense mandatory. See Angel v. State, 769 So. 2d 494, 496 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that a fine is mandatory for fourth or subsequent DUI). Section 775.083(l)(e) provides that a person who has been convicted of a third-degree felony may be sentenced to pay a fine not to exceed $5000. Therefore, a p…
  • Johnson v. State, 952 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)
    …status. However, the court indicated the record did not reflect any affirmative action on the part of the defendant to either request counsel or assert his rights that he was aware of by his prior contact with the system. Relying on Angel v. State, 769 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), the court found that the defendant’s statement that he did not recall whether he had been advised of his rights by the special magistrate was fatal to his position. The trial court revoked the defendant’s probation, adjudicated…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw