ROLANDO GONZALEZ, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Single Subject Rule cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Gonzalez v. State, 742 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999) wherein the Third District Court of Appeal certified the following question as one of great public importance:
Whether chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, violates the single subject rule requirement contained in article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution.
We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Consistent with our decisions in Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla.2000), and Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla.2000), we quash the district court’s decision and remand for resentencing in accordance with the sentencing guidelines in effect on March 12, 1996, the date of the offenses.
It is so ordered.
SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
City OF Parker v. State, 992 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 2008)…roved insufficient. See 392 So. 2d at 898. This distinction is dispositive because it directly implicates the central premise of our decisions in County of Volusia v. State, 417 So. 2d 968, 972 (Fla.1982), and Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012, 1023-26 (Fla.2000): The entity of local government may not circumvent the referendum requirement because its financing scheme inevitably requires that it pay for its debt with ad valorem tax revenue. See also Strand v. Escambia County, No. SC06-189…
-
Stalley v. Transitional Hosps. Corp. OF Tampa, Inc., 44 So. 3d 627 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010)…ement that JoAnne signed. Ratification of an agent’s prior unauthorized actions occurs when the principal is fully informed of the agent’s act and affirmatively manifests an intent to approve that act. See, e.g., Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. Co. v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012, 1021 (Fla.2000) (quoting Ball v. Yates, 158 Fla. 521, 29 So. 2d 729, 732 (1946)); G & M Rests. Corp. v. Tropical Mitsic Serv., Inc., 161 So. 2d 556, 557-58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964); Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Peninger, 603 So. 2d 57, 58 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)…
-
Strand v. Escambia Cnty., 992 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 2008)…2, Fla. Const; see also County of Volusia v. State, 417 So. 2d 968, 972 (Fla.1982) (“That which may not be done directly may not be done indirectly.” (citing State v. Halifax Hosp. Dist., 159 So. 2d 231 (Fla.1963))); Frankenmuth Mut. Ins. v. Magaha, 769 So. 2d 1012, 1023-26 (Fla.2000) (holding that computer lease- [*164] purchase agreement, which would inevitably have required Escambia County to appropriate ad valorem taxes to make lease payments, violated article VII, section 12). Political expediency cannot…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Heggs v. State, 759 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 2000)
- Xzavier Trapp v. State, 760 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2000)
- Gonzalez v. State, 742 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)