JOHN F. CURRY, JR., PETITIONER,

v.

MICHAEL W. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Burgess v. Crosby, 870 So. 2d 217 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)
  …ere is no similar time limit in the rules of appellate procedure to challenge other Department orders on gain time, nor orders of the Florida Parole Commission in parole revocation or presumptive parole release date proceedings. . Brazell v. State, 770 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Riddle v. State, 686 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Fulton v. State, 659 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).…
• Scott v. State, 805 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …1991). That is not, however, the case, here because Scott was not awaiting transportation to prison. Scott was being held pending placement in a drug treatment facility. Credit for this time is properly awarded by the trial court. Brazell v. State, 770 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Riddle v. State, 686 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996); Fulton v. State, 659 So. 2d 491 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). If, as Scott alleges, the Par hold limited his ability to be released from custody, then he may be entitled to credit for the…
• Johnson v. State, 783 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)
  …Zeigler v. State, 632 So. 2d 48 (Fla.1993). However, rule 3.800(a) does not prohibit the filing of successive motions, although “a defendant is not entitled to successive review of a specific issue which has already been decided.” Brazell v. State, 770 So. 2d 189 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings on this claim. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for further proceedings. PARKER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and SALCINES, JJ., concur. . Johnson titled th…

Authorities Cited

• Brown v. Campion, 757 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)