JOSEPH F. SYKOSKY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prosecutorial Comment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This appeal arises from an order summarily denying Joseph Sykosky’s motion pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. Mr. Sykosky alleges ineffective assistance of counsel on two grounds. First, he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to ask for limiting and jury instructions on Williams rule evidence. Second, he alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to several instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comment. The trial court summarily denied both claims without attaching any portion of the record conclusively refuting them. We therefore reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing or for the trial court to specify and attach to an order portions of the record conclusively refuting the claims.
JOANOS, WOLF, and BENTON, JJ., CONCUR.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rowe v. State, 777 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…of section 57.085, Florida Statutes (1999), or pay a filing fee. We have previously held that dismissal of a petition for writ of mandamus for noncompliance with section 57.085, Florida Statutes, is error. See Doss v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 770 So. 2d 207, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Wilson v. Moore, 767 So. 2d 1246, 1246 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Wrisper v. Florida Dep’t of Corrections, 765 So. 2d 295, 295-96 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). Several months before the circuit court dismissed Mr. Rowe’s petition, importa…