N.L. AND L.R., APPELLANTS,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
N.L. AND L.R., APPELLANTS,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, APPELLEE
770 So. 2d 220
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The issue in this case is precisely the one considered in L.Y. v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 696 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997): whether the law of Florida permits the retention of circuit court juvenile jurisdiction over a person after the age of eighteen when she continues to receive services from the Department of Children and Family Services. As the trial court ruled, we hold, for the reasons well articulated in L.Y., that it does not. Accordingly, on the authority of L.Y., the decision below terminating the jurisdiction of the circuit court, juvenile division, over the appellants is Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
B.W. v. Dep't of Child. & Fam. Servs., 842 So. 2d 1000 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…85 So. 2d 1240 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). Adjudication affirmed; cause remanded for further proceedings. . We note that W.E.W. is already eighteen years old and no longer under the jurisdiction of the court. N.L. v. Dep’t of Children & Family Servs., 770 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); L.Y v. Dep’t of Health & Rehab. Servs., 696 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).…
-
Fla. Dept. OF Child. & Fam. Servs. v. In the Interest of C.K., 851 So. 2d 206 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)…al court will comply herewith. . For a thorough analysis of the applicable law (and of concerns like ours) see L.Y. v. Department of Health & Rehab. Servs., 696 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). . N.L. v. Department of Children & Family Servs., 770 So. 2d 220 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); L.Y. v. Department of Health & Rehab. Servs., 696 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).…
-
Hadsock v. Bush, 180 F. Supp. 2d 1321 (S.D. Fla. 2001)
Authorities Cited
- L.Y. and Melody v. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 696 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)