ROSEMARY THOMAS AND LIEUTENANT THOMAS, ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
KEVIN BEARY, ETC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Rosemary Thomas appealed summary judgment entered against her in a civil action against police officers for falsely arresting her for aggravated assault. The court affirmed, holding that the officers had probable cause to arrest Thomas based on a complainant's report that she pointed a gun at him, regardless of whether Thomas was ultimately guilty or innocent of the crime.
Summary judgment was properly granted because the officers had probable cause to arrest Thomas based on the witness complaint that she pointed a gun, and the officers' ultimate liability does not depend on the arrestee's guilt or innocence. The officers reasonably believed, based on the credible account of Almonte and the undisputed facts, that a crime had been committed.
[1] Probable cause for arrest exists when officers' investigation reasonably convinces them that a party has committed a felony, even if facts provided by a witness later pro…
[2] A police officer is not liable for making an arrest if the investigation reasonably leads them to believe a felony has been committed, regardless of the defendant's ultim…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“We believe her ultimate guilt or innocence is irrelevant to the right, even the obligation, of the police to make an arrest in this case.”
Establishes the central principle that an arrestee's actual guilt or innocence does not determine whether officers had probable cause for the arrest.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceRuben Almonte, a homeowner association member, came to Rosemary Thomas's door to complain about a statement saying he owed money to the association. W…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse False Arrest cases and more on FLexlaw
HARRIS, J.
Rosemary Thomas was the president of the homeowner’s association in which Ruben Almonte was a member. Almonte knocked on Thomas’ door on the evening in question to complain about a statement in a homeowner publication that he (Al-monte) owed money to the association. While her husband was at the door arguing with Almonte, Rosemary walked up with a gun in her hand. Almonte retreated from the residence and called the police reporting that he had been threatened by Rosemary, who had pointed a gun at him.
After Almonte had left the residence, Rosemary also called the police to report that Almonte had assaulted her and her husband. The police took statements from all parties and, after Rosemary admitted possessing the gun (but denied pointing it at Almonte), the police believed Almonte and arrested Rosemary. The State Attorney subsequently decided not to prosecute. The trial court granted summary judgment against Rosemary and her husband on their various actions against the officers and the sheriff. We affirm.
Rosemary claims that the disputed fact that she pointed a gun at Almonte should prevent a summary judgment on the issue of probable cause for her arrest. We believe her ultimate guilt or innocence is irrelevant to the right, even the obligation, of the police to make an arrest in this case. If the officers’ investigation reasonably convinces them that a party has committed a felony, this panel will not make the officers liable if facts given by a witness subsequently prove untrue. Here the officers knew, because it was admitted by all, that Almonte was arguing with Mr. Thomas when Rosemary approached them with a gun in her hand. The officers knew that after Rosemary came upon the scene with the gun that Almonte left and reported to the police the aggravated assault. The fact that the officers believed Almonte when he said that Rosemary pointed the gun at him instead of believing Rosemary’s statement that she kept the gun at her side gave the officer probable cause to believe that a crime was committed and that Rosemary committed it.
Judge Baker’s Final Summary Judgment based on an excellent Memorandum of Ruling is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
PETERSON and PLEUS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Collins v. City OF Miami, 881 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Thomas v. Beary, 770 So. 2d 699, 700 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (“[U]l-timate guilt or innocence is irrelevant to the right, even the obligation, of the police to make an arrest..If the officers’ investigation reasonably convinces them that a party has committed a felony, this panel ■wil…