KEITH ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
KEITH ROBINSON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
770 So. 2d 732
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.800(a).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Frazier v. State, 871 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…argues that the trial court fundamentally erred in adjudicating him guilty for his failure to appear when he was not formally charged with the offense. We agree and find it was error for the trial court to convict him on this charge. Scala v. State, 770 So. 2d 732 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Repetti v. State, 741 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). We reverse his conviction on this charge. [*1037] AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part. FARMER, C.J., GUNTHER and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.…
-
Dooley v. State, 933 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…PER CURIAM. Ronald Dooley was convicted of failing to appear at sentencing. Dooley argues that because he was never charged with the offense, his conviction for the same was fundamental error. As we stated in Scala v. State, 770 So. 2d 732, 732-33 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), “[c]onviction for a charge not made by information or indictment is a denial of due process, and the complete failure to charge a crime is a defect that can be raised at any time, including on appeal.” We accept the Stat…