EDWARD R. HAYCRAFT, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-11-08
No. 4D99-4176
POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
770 So. 2d 737 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Hoggins, 718 So. 2d 761 (Fla.1998).

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stancle v. State, 854 So. 2d 228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
    …lso asserted that Officer Kelley’s testimony was unreasonable, laughable, absurd, and directed the jury to use their common sense. Clearly, it would be error for the state to comment on a defendant’s failure to produce evidence. Whittaker v. State, 770 So. 2d 737, 739 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). We have considered Shelton v. State, 654 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), and deem it distinguishable. There, the defendant was convicted of selling cocaine. An undercover police officer testified that he bought a rock of…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw