DELAWRENCE NEWBERRY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-11-08
No. 4D99-4282
KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.
770 So. 2d 1258 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000) Negative Treatment
Cited by 13 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgments of conviction and sentences for robbery with a firearm and delinquent in possession of a weapon/firearm. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant presenting his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel and involuntary and unknowing guilty plea to these charges through post-conviction proceedings.

KLEIN, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (11 total)

  • Grosvenor v. State, 874 So. 2d 1176 (Fla. 2004)
    …uld have likely resulted in either an acquittal, or a more favorable sentence following a conviction of the charged offense or of a lesser included offense. I conclude that this is the correct analysis. I would not approve either Cousino v. State, 770 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), or Mason v. State, 742 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Cousino has no analysis of this issue but merely adopts the view of the First District. The lineage of the First District’s decision on this issue is traced to Price v. Stat…
    1 / 2
  • Young v. State, 789 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
    …nt claims ineffective assistance in connection with a plea of no contest or guilty, the defendant must allege that he had a viable defense, which Young has not done. See Siegel v. State, 586 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991); but see Cousino v. State, 770 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(allegation defendant would not have entered plea but for counsel’s omission sufficient to show prejudice and allegation that there was a viable defense is not required); Mason v. State, 742 So. 2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(same).…
  • Tecoy Marquis Campbell v. State, 139 So. 3d 490 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
    …8, 243-44, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969))). Nevertheless, this claim is facially insufficient because Campbell did not allege that he was prejudiced by counsel’s failure to advise him of all of the rights he was waiving. See Cousino v. State, 770 So. 2d 1258, 1260 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (noting that to establish prejudice from counsel’s ineffectiveness during the plea process, a postconviction movant must allege that there is a reasonable probability that but for counsel’s ineffectiveness, he would have in…

Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw