DOTSON WOODS, APPELLANT,
v.
ESTATE OF JEREMY C. WOODS, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court affirmed trial court's allocation of wrongful death settlement proceeds entirely to the mother of a minor decedent, finding no abuse of discretion where the father had minimal contact and provided no support.
A trial court does not abuse its discretion in allocating all wrongful death settlement proceeds for mental pain and suffering to the mother where the father had little or no contact with the child and provided minimal or no support.
[1] In allocating wrongful death settlement proceeds for mental pain and suffering between competing parents, the trial court has considerable discretion to employ a reasonab…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJeremy C. Woods, a minor, died and his estate settled a wrongful death claim. The trial court had to allocate proceeds for mental pain and suffering b…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Allocation Of Settlement Proceeds cases and more on FLexlaw
NESBITT, Senior Judge.
Following the settlement of a wrongful death action on behalf of the estate of the decedent, Jeremy C. Woods, a minor, the proceeding became a contest between the competing natural parents as to the proper allocation of the sums available as a result of the claim of mental pain and suffering. See § 768.21(4)Fla. Stat. (1998). The trial judge adopted the mother’s argument that the father was not present at the child’s birth nor listed on his birth certificate, and “had little or no contact with Jeremy dur ing his lifetime, and provided minimal or no support for Jeremy during his lifetime.”
At the conclusion of the hearing on the matter, the court determined that the mother was entitled to all of the proceeds apportionable. The decided cases suggest no exact formula governing the allocation of the available funds in such a situation, and that the probate judge has considerable latitude in its allocation. See In re Estate of Wiggins, 729 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)(concluding trial court obligated to employ reasonable and equitable method of distribution). In light of the findings made, we cannot say the distribution of the funds at issue exclusively to the mother, as the child’s sole care giver, was an abuse of discretion. Id.
Accordingly the order under review is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- In re Est. OF Sallie Pearl Wiggins v. Destin, 729 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)