CARNELL HAWTHORNE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
CARNELL HAWTHORNE, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
772 So. 2d 19
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (2000)
Caution
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm based on our recent decision in Hobby v. State, 761 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and' GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Siroos Pirzadeh v. State, 854 So. 2d 740 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…h law enforcement. Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477, 101 S.Ct. 1880, 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981). The State relies on Oregon v. Bradshaw, 462 U.S. 1039, 103 S.Ct. 2830, 77 L.Ed.2d 405 (1983); Francis v. State, 808 So. 2d 110 (Fla.2001), and Hill v. State, 772 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 790 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.2001), for the proposition that Pirzadeh reinitiated the conversation. The State’s reliance is misplaced. In Bradshaw, the defendant asked the police officers, “Well, what is going to happen to me n…
-
N. J. O. v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2020)…l his 'side of the story' "). Instead, once a suspect has invoked his or her right to counsel, officers are required to cease questioning the suspect until either he or she reinitiates contact or counsel is provided and present. See Hill v. State, 772 So. 2d 19, 22 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("Once a suspect invokes his right to counsel, no further police-initiated custodial interrogation can take place unless the accused initiates further communication, exchanges, or conversations with the police." (citing Edward…
Authorities Cited
- Monti v. State, 761 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)