W. A. GRIFFIN, O. A. GRIFFIN, W. B. GRIFFIN, R. A. GRIFFIN, APPELLANTS,
v.
DOTHAN GUANO COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decree, finding that while procedural irregularities may have occurred in complex litigation, they did not result in a miscarriage of justice.
The court held that procedural irregularities or errors in complex litigation are not grounds for reversal unless a miscarriage of justice is demonstrated.
“Good lawyers may differ in their methods of handling the details of a labored litigation like this. The net result of these differences sometimes amounts to irregularities or even errors, but they are not ground for reversal in this State unless a miscarriage of justice in shown.”
This quote explains the court's standard for reviewing complex litigation and the threshold for reversal.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThis case involved two foreclosure proceedings, a bankruptcy proceeding, and an extended account dispute between the appellants and the appellee. The …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Miscarriage Of Justice Standard cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
The transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel in this cause have been examined carefully. It involves two foreclosure proceedings, a bankruptcy proceeding together with other transactions including an account between appellant and appellee running over a period of years. Good lawyers may differ in their methods of handling the details of a labored litigation like this. The net result of these differences sometimes amounts to irregularities or even errors, but they are not ground for reversal in this State unless a miscarriage of justice in shown. We cannot see that an opinion discussing the various assignments of error would serve any useful purpose. The record considered as an entirety shows a just conclusion was reached. So the decree of the Chancellor is affirmed. Section 2812 of the Revised General Statutes of Florida.
A Writ of Error to the Circuit Court for Jackson County; Amos Lewis, Judge.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Richards v. Samuel, 184 So. 2d 516 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966)…equent agreement recognizing the debt. The judgment is affirmed upon the rule that an appellate court will not reverse a judgment where the record, considered as an entirety, shows that a just conclusion was reached. See Griffin v. Dothan Guano Co., 93 Fla. 1104, 113 So. 563 (1927). Affirmed.…