WILLARD D. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fredrick v. N. Palm Beach Cnty. Improvement Dist., 971 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)
  …licable documents and records prior to their purchase in Ibis and did so at their own peril.” Analysis Review of a trial court’s conclusions of law and statutory construction is de novo. Dependable Component Supply, Inc. v. Pace Electronics, Inc., 772 So. 2d 582, 584 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Appellate review of an entry of summary judgment is likewise de novo. Florida Bar v. Cosnow, 797 So. 2d 1255, 1258 (Fla.2001). Summary judgment is proper only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the moving p…
• Jorikahs AIR Servs., Inc. v. Avtech Consultants, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See § 672.606, Fla. Stat. (2000); McNeill v. Jack, 83 So. 2d 704 (Fla. 1955); Dependable Component Supply, Inc. v. Pace Electronics, Inc., 772 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Bair v. A.E.G.I.S. Corp., 523 So. 2d 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988), review denied, 531 So. 2d 1355 (Fla.1988); see Mahler v. Allied Marine, 513 So. 2d 677, 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).…
• Wilson v. State, 942 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
  …3.850(c). Accordingly, we affirm, but without prejudice to appellant’s filing a sworn, facially sufficient amended motion for postconviction relief in the trial court within thirty days of the issuance of this Court’s mandate. See Thompson v. State, 772 So. 2d 582 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); Williams v. State, 884 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Any such motion shall not be deemed successive. We express no opinion as to the merits of appellant’s claims. LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., concur. WOLF, J., dissents without op…