STACI LEE MEYER, APPELLANT,
v.
CLEOMENE ALEXANDRE, EDNER FRANCOIS AND ILLINOIS NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Fla. 4th DCA | 2000-12-13
No. 4D00-1296
GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
772 So. 2d 627 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2000)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

A plaintiff cannot recover attorney's fees against a liability insurer under the offer of judgment statute when the insurer is not a party to the action.


Facts & Procedural History

Plaintiff obtained a verdict and sought attorney's fees under the offer of judgment statute. Unable to collect from the defendants, she moved to join …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
KLEIN, J.

KLEIN, J.

Appellant plaintiff was awarded attorney’s fees under the offer of judgment statute, section 768.79, Florida Statutes (1995), as a result of a verdict she obtained in an accident case. She has apparently been unable to collect the fees against the defendants and has filed a motion to join the defendant’s liability insurer, Illinois National Insurance Company as a party, in order to request a judgment for the attorney’s fees against the insurer. The trial court denied the motion to join the insurer, without prejudice to plaintiff seeking the fees in an action for bad faith against the insurer.1

Under similar circumstances, the Second District Court of Appeal concluded that the plaintiff could not recover attorney’s fees against a liability insurer, which was not a party, under the offer of judgment statute. Sparks v. Barnes, 755 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). We agree with the reasoning of Sparks and affirm. See also Feltzin v. Bernard, 719 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

GROSS and HAZOURI, JJ., concur. . The judgment obtained by plaintiffs in this case was in excess of the policy limits.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw