PHILLIP MAURICE HAYES, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Marion Cnty. v. Priest, 786 So. 2d 623 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …County, 774 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2001) (discussing Florida’s water policies, including the state’s attempts to cut down on water usage). This case is also akin to a recent “conditional use” case. In City of Jacksonville Beach v. Car Spa, Inc., 772 So. 2d 630 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), the First District applied City of Dania to conclude that the circuit court improperly reweighed the evidence, substituting its judgment for that of the planning commission as to the relative weight of that evidence. In doing so…
• State v. Baird, 175 So. 3d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)
  …e proper approach is narrow here, focusing on whether the officer’s testimony, the arresting/booking report, or the video — or portions thereof — support the hearing officer’s factual findings. (e.s.) See City of Jacksonville Beach v. Car Spa, Inc., 772 So. 2d 630, 631-32 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (‘[I]t is clear that ... rather than reviewing the entire record to detex-mine whether the Planning Commission’s decision was supported by competent substantial evidence, the circuit court considered only portions of the…
• Miami-Dade Cnty. v. Publix Supermarkets, Inc. (Fla. 3d DCA 2020)
  …ne. . . , rather than the standard of review. It found the existence of competent, substantial evidence to support respondents’ assertion, which is not part of the review process outlined by Vaillant.”); City of Jacksonville Beach v. Car Spa, Inc., 772 So. 2d 630, 632 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“We conclude that the circuit court applied the wrong law to the extent that it failed to review the entire record to determine whether the Planning Commission’s decision was supported by competent substantial evidence and,…