ERELSON J. WARNER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ERELSON J. WARNER, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
773 So. 2d 78
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Erelson Warner appeals his sentences under the “Prison Releasee Reoffender Punishment Act.” See 775.082(8), Fla. Stat. (1997). We affirm, but, as we did in Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA) rev. granted 740 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 1999), we certify the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:
DOES THE PRISON RELEASEE REOFFENDER PUNISHMENT ACT, CODIFIED AS SECTION 775.082(8), FLORIDA STATUTES (1997), VIOLATE THE SEPARATION OF POWERS CLAUSE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
AFFIRMED.
DAVIS, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Earon L. Tyler v. State, 793 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…will hear the specific nature of the prior convictions, and the defendant shows that because of the misinformation he did not testify, he has satisfied the deficient performance prong of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Everhart v. State, 773 So. 2d 78, 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Further [*142] more, if an attorney threatens to withdraw in the event his client testifies on his own behalf, and the defendant’s will is overborne to the extent that he does not take the stand, the performance prong of a cl…
-
Hernando Garcia v. State, 21 So. 3d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009)…137,141 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (remanding for an evidentiary hearing where defendant alleged that trial counsel misinformed him that the jury would hear specific nature of prior convictions as impeachment, and did not testify); accord Everhart v. State, 773 So. 2d 78, 79-80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We should remand for an evidentiary hearing on ground three. In ground one, the defendant alleges ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to investigate, depose and/or subpoena critical witnesses for the defense. Th…
-
Carver Askew v. State, 265 So. 3d 693 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019)…37, 141-42 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001). Because the trial court’s colloquy with Appellant regarding the waiver of his right to testify at trial does not conclusively refute this claim, we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing. See Everhart v. State, 773 So. 2d 78, 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED for further proceedings. WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. Ap…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)