M. C. COMBS, APPELLANT,
v.
ETHEL COMBS AND A. F. CORNELIUS, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
M.C. Combs appealed a chancery decree that reformed deeds to jointly vest property in both M.C. Combs and his ex-wife Ethel Combs, and confirmed Ethel's ownership of Lot 6 (the family home) while awarding Lot 7 to M.C. Combs. The Florida Supreme Court affirmed, holding that M.C. Combs had no title to Lot 6 based on the agreed division of joint property and Ethel's position as the home's occupant and family head after the divorce.
M.C. Combs has no title to Lot 6. The chancellor properly reformed the deeds, adjudicated the agreed division of joint property (Ethel receiving Lot 6, M.C. Combs receiving Lot 7), and confirmed Ethel's ownership because she furnished part of the consideration, remained on the property as the family home, and became the family head when M.C. Combs left.
“When the conveyance of Lot 6 to Cornelius was made the record title was in M. C. Combs, but when the deeds to Combs were reformed to vest the title of Lots 6 and 7 in M. C. Combs and Ethel Combs, the couple had been divorced and the conveyance of Lot 6 had been made through Cornelius to Ethel Combs, who with her children had remained on the property as their home”
Establishes the factual basis for the holding that Ethel's title to Lot 6 was properly confirmed.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceM.C. and Ethel Combs owned two lots (6 and 7) as their homestead, with record title in M.C. Combs. On March 31, 1922, both spouses conveyed Lot 6 (the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Title To Real Property cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
It appears that M.
C. Combs and Ethel Combs lived with their children on and occupied as a home described twenty acres of land known as Lots 6 and 7, the record title to which was in M.
C. Combs; that on March 31, 1922, the husband and wife for one dollar and other valuable considerations, joined in conveying ten acres of the land, including the family home, known as Lot 6, to A.
P. Cornelius; that the couple were divorced October 14, 1922, the father leaving the mother and children living on Lot 6 as their home; that on October 3, 1923, Cornelius conveyed the ten acres known as Lot 6 to Ethel Combs; that on October 27, 1926, M.
C. Combs conveyed Lot 7 to George C. Putnam. A bill in equity was brought by M.
C. Combs against Ethel Combs to annul the divorce decree and to cancel the conveyances of Lot 6 to Ethel Combs on the ground of duress, it being also claimed that the property was the homestead of M.
C. Combs. The chancellor on supporting evidence held the divorce effective and ordered that the deeds to M.
C. Combs under which he claimed title, be reformed to make the title in the names of M.
C. Combs and Ethel Combs upon the showing that she furnished a part of the consideration on an agreement with her husband that the land was to be conveyed to her husband and herself jointly. The decree adjudicated that the husband and wife divided their joint property, the husband taking Lot 7, and the wife Lot 6; and confirmed the conveyance of Lot 6 through. Cornelius to the divorced wife, and also ordered her to quit-claim Lot 7 to George C. Putnam, the grantee of M.
C. Combs.
M. C. Combs appealed.
n When the conveyance of Lot 6 to Cornelius was made the record title was in M. C. Combs, but when the deeds to Combs were reformed to vest the title of Lots 6 and 7 in M. C. Combs and Ethel Combs, the couple had been divorced and the conveyance of Lot 6 had been made through Cornelius to Ethel Combs, who with her children had remained on the property as their home; and by virtue of the agreed division of the joint property as adjudicated by the court and the conveyance through Cornelius, Ethel Combs became the owner of Lot 6, and she also became the head of the family when M. C. Combs left. M. C. Combs therefore has not title to Lot 6.
Affirmed.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.