KATE HAVLIN MARTIN, EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN H. HAVLIN, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
H. P. ROTHER, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a lower court's decision in a material man's lien case but reversed the award of solicitor's fees, citing unconstitutionality.
No, the award of solicitor's fees was improper and should be reversed. The rest of the decree should be affirmed.
“It does not appear that the heirs of John H. Havlin were necessary parties to the suit.”
Establishes a point of fact regarding necessary parties.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA material man sued the owner of real estate to enforce a material man's lien for services rendered. The lower court entered a decree in favor of the …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Unconstitutional Statute cases and more on FLexlaw
Per Curiam.
This was a suit in equity by a material man against the owner to enforce an alleged material man’s lien against the real estate and buildings erected thereon, as described in the bill of complaint. It does not appear that the heirs of John H. Havlin were necessary parties to the suit. Title to the land might have been in the executrix of John H. Havlin. Decree was in favor of the complainant for the sum of $442.54 principal, $95.70 interest, and $53.82 as fee for Complainant’s Solicitor. The record discloses no reversible error except that committed by the Chancellor in entering the decree for solicitor’s fees.
That part of the decree allowing fees for complainant’s solicitor should be reversed upon authority of the opinion in the case of Palm Beach Bank & Trust Company v. Lain-hart et al., 84 Fla. 662; and Crim et al. v. Drake, 86 Fla. 470 and cases there cited, and should otherwise be affirmed. Chapter 9323, Acts of 1923, does not cure the unconstitutionality of Section 3525, Revised General Statutes. The cost of this appeal should be taxed against the Complainant, the Appellee here, and it is so ordered.
Reversed in part.
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
Strum, J.
(concurring) :
The basis of classification involved in Chapter 9323, Laws of Florida, Acts of 1923, is distinguishable from that involved in the Texas statute construed and held valid in M. K & T. Ry. Co. v. Cade, 233 U. S. 642; 58 L. Ed. 1135, both as to the classes of debtors affected and as to .the amount contemplated and the latter being recognized as an element properly considered in determining the reasonableness of a classification. S. A. L. Ry. v. Seegers, 207 U. S. 73.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hunter v. Flowers, 43 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1949)…unconstitutional a statute providing for the payment of attorneys' fees in suits to enforce mechanics' liens, including both materialmen's and laborers' liens, see Franklin Savings and Loan Company v. Fisk, 98 Fla. 683, 124 So. 42; Martin v. Rother,94 Fla. 205, 113 So. 713, on the basis of a decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Union Terminal Co. et al. v. Turner Const. Co., 1918, 247 F. 727, 11 A.L.R. 880, holding that Section 2218, General Statutes of Florida 1906, providing…
Authorities Cited
- Missouri v. Cade, 233 U.S. 642 (U.S. 1914)
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Seegers, 207 U.S. 73 (U.S. 1907)
- Palm Beach Bank & Tr. Co. v. Lainhart, 84 Fla. 662 (Fla. 1922)
- Crim v. Drake, 86 Fla. 470 (Fla. 1923)