KATE HAVLIN MARTIN, EXECUTRIX OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF JOHN H. HAVLIN, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
M. D. WILSON, N. S. WOOD AND J. H. WARE, TRADING AND DOING BUSINESS AS WILSON SHEET METAL WORKS, APPELLEES

Fla. | 1927-07-13
Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur., Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.
94 Fla. 207 Florida Supreme Court (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The transcript of the record in this case having been examined and considered by the Court, it is found that the decree herein should be affirmed, except as to that part of the decrée allowing attorney’s fees, which should be reversed, and the costs of the appeal should be taxed against the complainant on authority of the opinion in the case of Kate Havlin Martin et al. v. Rother, decided at this term of the Court, and it is so ordered.

Reversed in part.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, C. J., and Strum and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • The Franklin Sav. & Loan Co. v. Fisk, 98 Fla. 683 (Fla. 1929)
    …for the full amount the mortgage is obligated to advance under its terms.” [*687] There was also error in allowing solicitor’s fees to appellee Harris. Security Finance Co. v. Gardiner, 114 So. R. 232, 94 Fla. 549; Martin v. Rothar, 113 So. R. 713, 94 Fla. 207, and cases cited. For the errors pointed out, the decree appealed from must be reversed. Reversed and remanded. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis, J., concur. Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw