NEIL STEWART FORMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Upward Departure Sentence cases and more on FLexlaw
WHATLEY, Judge.
Neil Stewart Forman appeals his convictions and sentences for attempted first-degree murder, burglary with assault or battery, and battery. We affirm his convictions without discussion. However, we reverse and remand his sentences for re-sentencing pursuant to the guidelines.
The State properly concedes that For-man’s sentences must be reversed because he received upward departure sentences and no written reasons for the departure are contained in the record. See Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla.2000). Therefore, we reverse Forman’s sentences and remand for resentencing pursuant to the guidelines. See Edwards v. State, 770 So. 2d 179, 180 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“[A] departure sentence for which no written reasons were filed must be reversed and be remanded for resentencing under the guidelines.”).
Convictions affirmed, sentences reversed and remanded with directions.
PARKER, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Contrera v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 894 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004)…ve their right to supplement the record because they did hot request that the transcript be included as part of the record in the initial designation required by rule 9.200(a) and (b). We also disagree with Sienkiewicz v. Intrepid Powerboats, Inc., 774 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), to the extent it appears to limit an appellate court’s obligation to afford an opportunity to supplement the record to cases in which there is “nothing in [the] record [which] show[s] that the Unemployment Appeals Commission had…
-
DeSTEFANO v. Aped Acquisition Co., Inc., 784 So. 2d 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…a termination, not a voluntary resignation. Therefore, DeStefano was entitled to unemployment benefits unless Aped showed that he was terminated for misconduct. §§ 443.091, 443.101(l)(a), Fla. Stat. (1999); Sienkiewicz v. Intrepid Powerboats, Inc., 774 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Aped presented no evidence of such at the hearing. We reverse and remand with directions that DeStefano be awarded unemployment compensation benefits. Reversed. THREADGILL, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, MONTEREY (Senior) Judge, concu…
-
McENERY v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n & Newberg Irrigation, Inc., 835 So. 2d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)…left work due to illness, which constitutes good cause, we reverse. The appeals referee found that McEn-ery resigned. We accept this finding because it was supported by competent, substantial evidence. See Sienkiewicz v. Intrepid Powerboats, Inc., 774 So. 2d 739, 740 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). If the employer meets the burden of showing an employee’s voluntary departure, the employee must prove that he left for good cause in order to qualify for unemployment benefits. Lewis v. Lakeland Health Care Ctr., Inc., 68…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Maddox v. State, 760 So. 2d 89 (Fla. 2000)
- Edwards v. State, 770 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)