JACK HOUSTON BROOKS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
JACK HOUSTON BROOKS, APPELLANT,
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, APPELLEE
774 So. 2d 809
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Having considered the appellant’s response to the Court’s order issued September 27, 2000, the Court has determined that the order on appeal is neither a final order, nor an appealable non-final order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. The dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant to file a separate appeal when the trial court enters a final order. ERVIN, BOOTH, and KAHN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Forsythe v. State, 840 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)…ng the vacation. [*442] Once a defendant reneges on the plea agreement, the state has the option of withdrawing from the agreement, and either going to trial or seeking a new agreement. Cf., Latiif v. State, 787 So. 2d 834 (Fla.2001); Gray v. State, 774 So. 2d 809 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Parker v. State, 767 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); see also Capio v. State, 765 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). After all, if a criminal defendant does not feel so bound by the terms of a plea agreement that he or she will com…