F.B., APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
F.B., APPELLANT,
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, APPELLEE
774 So. 2d 824
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the initial brief of appellant, the judgment is affirmed on authority of Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bryant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 182 So. 3d 927 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…to file a notice of appeal within thirty days of rendition precludes this Court from exercising jurisdiction-over the appeal. See Longleaf C & D Disposal Facility, Inc. v. Green’s Fill Dirt, Inc., 98 So. 3d 1250 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Stok v. Cabrera, 774 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see also Chandler, 101 So. 3d at 949 (“Florida courts are required to dismiss an appellate proceeding if it was not initiated within the applicable time limit.”). - Finally, we also dismiss Bryant’s appeal of the Orders of Janua…
-
Concierge Auctions, LLC v. Coldwell Banker Residential Real Est., LLC, 394 So. 3d 119 (Fla. 3d DCA 2024)
-
Vujin v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 201 So. 3d 861 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)…s June 15th order. After providing the parties with an opportunity to brief the jurisdictional issue, we dismissed Appellant’s appeal because we lack jurisdic [*862] tion to review this June 15th non-appeal-able interlocutory order. Stok v. Cabrera, 774 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) (Mem); Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3). We, therefore, deny Appellant’s instant motion seeking rehearing, clarification and certification of our dismissal order. . See Fla. R. App. P. 9.130(a)(3)(C)(i). . Appellant is not precluded…