MATTHEW ROTH, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dias v. State, 812 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
  …state that he was the aggressor, which appears to be Walker’s conclusion. After reading the statement in the deposition, the court concluded there was no discovery violation. We hold that the court did not abuse its discretion. See Mascolo v. State, 774 So. 2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Furthermore, appellant’s counsel was able to discredit Detective Walker by securing his admission that the statement was in none of the reports and, had it been made, it would have been an important fact to put in the repor…
• Kipp v. State, 128 So. 3d 879 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013)
  …ion is alleged, the standard of appellate review is whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining if a violation occurred and if so, whether it was inadvertent, and not prejudicial to the preparation of the defense.” Mascolo v. State, 774 So. 2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(b)(l)(A)(i) requires the state to disclose “expert witnesses who have not provided a written report and a curriculum vitae or who are going to testify.” It is not enough to list suc…
• M.N. v. State, 272 So. 3d 465 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019)
  …M.F. v. State, 255 So. 3d 519, 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (When reviewing the adequacy of a Richardson hearing, a "ruling that no [discovery] violation occurred moots any inquiry into whether there was procedural prejudice."); see also Mascolo v. State, 774 So. 2d 827, 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) ("[T]he trial court found there was no discovery violation. We find that the record supports the decision of the trial court and therefore we find no error.").…

Authorities Cited

• Trovillo v. Fla. Dep't OF LAW Enf't, 762 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)