MITCHELL CALLAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-12-29
No. 1D00-401
MINER, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
774 So. 2d 868 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*869] PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. Robinson v. State, 373 So. 2d 898 (Fla.1979).

MINER, BENTON and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Germaine R. Brown, 175 So. 3d 833 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015)
    …35] assertion of the right to accelerate was not irrevocably “exercised” within the meaning of cases defining accrual for foreclosure actions, when the right was merely asserted and then dismissed without prejudice. See Olympia Mortg. Corp. v. Pugh, 774 So. 2d 868, 866-67 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (“By voluntarily dismissing the suit, [the mortgagee] in effect decided not to accelerate payment on the note and mortgage at that time.”); see also Slottow v. Hull Inv. Co., 100 Fla. 244, 129 So. 577, 582 (1930) (a mortg…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw