ADOLPHUS S. ASHLEY, PETITIONER,

v.

MICHAEL W. MOORE, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Yusuf Mohamad Excavation, Inc. v. Ringhaver Equipment, 793 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)
  …ntend for the doctrine to apply. The Court further noted that to decide otherwise would require the Court to write into the statute a delayed discovery rule even though the legislature had not done so. See also In re: Receivership of Armor Ins. Co., 775 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(recognizing that the delayed discovery doctrine does not apply to actions on a written contract); Abbott Laboratories, Inc. v. General Elec. Capital, 765 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)(recognizing that the delayed discovery doctri…
• Gonzalez v. Catholic Cemeteries OF Archdiocese OF Miami, Inc., 870 So. 2d 918 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See and compare §§ 95.051, 95.11(3), Fla. Stat. (2001); Davis v. Monahan, 832 So. 2d 708 (Fla.2002); Wood v. Eli Lilly & Co., 701 So. 2d 344 (Fla.1997); In re Receivership of Armor Ins. Co., 775 So. 2d 367 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Ross v. Twenty-Four Collection, Inc., 617 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Trueba v. Pershing Indus., Inc., 374 So. 2d 47 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).…