KENNETH LOVERING, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Kenneth Lovering appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We reverse as to one of Lovering’s claims. Lovering alleged that he was sentenced based upon an improperly prepared scoresheet. Specifically he alleged that his primary offense was scored multiple times. The trial court denied this claim stating that Lovering was sentenced pursuant to a plea agreement for a specific term of years and that therefore his sentence was not affected by any scoresheet error. The trial court did not, however, attach record documents which demonstrate this. We therefore reverse and remand. If the trial court again denies this claim, it must attach record documents which demonstrate either that Lovering’s sentence was not affected by the alleged scoresheet error or that there was no scoresheet error. We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s order without comment.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded.
BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and STRINGER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders v. State, 793 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001)…and the owner of the house that was burglarized had caught Sanders in the act of burglary. The claim that the prosecutor presented an improper and prejudicial argument, that was not objected to by counsel, is facially sufficient. See Allen v. State, 775 So. 2d 400, 401 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). We reverse because the trial court summarily concluded that relief was not warranted and did not conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach record documents to support the ruling. The additional claims of prosecutorial miscon…