COMMERCIAL LAUNDRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
EUREKA HOUSING CORP., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 2000-12-20
No. 3D00-1069
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and SHEVIN and SORONDO, JJ.
775 So. 2d 999 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Because genuine material issues remain for appropriate resolution, including but not necessarily limited to questions of standing, implied actual notice of the interests of the tenant, see Lee County Bank v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 126 So. 2d 589 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961); Bodden v. Carbonell, 354 So. 2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), and laches, see City of Miami v. Carter, 105 So. 2d 5 (Fla.1958); City of Miami v. Gates, 393 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), review denied, 402 So. 2d 608 (Fla.1981), the summary judgment reforeclosing the appellant’s leasehold is reversed for further proceedings.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Skinner v. State, 31 So. 3d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)
    …onary certiorari jurisdiction pursuant to article Y, section 4(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution; and rules 9.030(b)(2)(B) and 9.100(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, to challenge the circuit court’s final appellate order. See Wood v. State, 775 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). ANALYSIS On certiorari review of the circuit court’s appellate order, we determine only whether the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law. See Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw