KEVIN E. WOOD, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
KEVIN E. WOOD, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
775 So. 2d 999
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the circuit court, acting in its appellate capacity. Our jurisdiction to review such an order is limited to certiorari. Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(B). However, rule 9.030(b)(2)(B) limits review of such orders to those that are final. The order of which petitioner seeks review is not final because it merely grants a motion to dismiss the appeal. See generally Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Accordingly, we conclude that we are obliged to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to petitioner’s right to seek review following the entry by the trial court of a final order. DISMISSED.
JOANOS, WEBSTER and PADOVANO, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Skinner v. State, 31 So. 3d 940 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010)…onary certiorari jurisdiction pursuant to article Y, section 4(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution; and rules 9.030(b)(2)(B) and 9.100(a), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, to challenge the circuit court’s final appellate order. See Wood v. State, 775 So. 2d 999, 1000 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). ANALYSIS On certiorari review of the circuit court’s appellate order, we determine only whether the circuit court afforded procedural due process and applied the correct law. See Haines City Cmty. Dev. v. Heggs, 658 So.…
Authorities Cited
- Benton v. Moore, 655 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)