BRUCE D. ROGERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 2000-12-29
No. 1D00-1175
ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur., WOLF, J., Specially concurs with opinion.
775 So. 2d 1002 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2000) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse this case in part and remand with instructions for the trial court to reconsider its retention of jurisdiction in light of this Court’s opinion in Hampton v. State, 764 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000). We affirm the caáe in all other respects.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part.

ERVIN and PADOVANO, JJ„ concur. WOLF, J., Specially concurs with opinion.

Concurrence
WOLF, J.,

WOLF, J.,

specially concurring.

I concur only because I am required to do so because of Hampton v. State, 764 So. 2d 829 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Wilfredo Baez v. State, 780 So. 2d 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)
    …edy, having presented his claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, is to file a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court of the jurisdiction in which he is incarcerated to compel the award of gain time. See Heaton v. State, 775 So. 2d 1002 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Cook v. State, 767 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Clements v. State, 761 So. 2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)(affirming denial of post-conviction motion seeking additional gain time pursuant to Heggs without taking a position on the…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw