DAVID M. HEATON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DAVID M. HEATON, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
775 So. 2d 1002
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (2001)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the denial of appellant’s motion to correct sentence. See Welling v. State, 748 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Arce v. State, 762 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). This affirmance is without prejudice to appellant presenting his gain-time claim administratively to the Department of Corrections, and, if necessary, seeking review of the Department’s ultimate decision through extraordinary writ petition to the circuit court. See Gatto v. State, 768 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
DELL, POLEN and GROSS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Arce v. State, 762 So. 2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)
- Welling v. State, 748 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999)
- Gatto v. State, 768 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)