JOSE RAMON LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOSE RAMON LOPEZ, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
775 So. 2d 1007
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2001)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based upon evidence contained in the affidavit of an anonymous tip which was corroborated by complaints from “concerned residents” about drug dealing at the appellant’s residence, and a one time trash pull which led to discovery of a considerable amount of drug paraphernalia and cocaine residue, we conclude that there was probable cause to support the issuance of warrant for a search of defendant’s home. See State v. Mayes, 666 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cooper v. State, 902 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)…posed was not illegal); Kenon v. State, 780 So. 2d 258, 261 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)(holding sentencing scoresheet errors harmless, where imposition of violent habitual offender sentence was appropriate, rendering guidelines inapplicable); Horn v. State, 775 So. 2d 1007, 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (holding habitual sentence rendered guidelines scoresheet irrelevant); Williams v. State, 773 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (holding habitual offender sentence rendered any errors in guidelines score sheet harmless). Theref…
-
Rankin v. State, 174 So. 3d 1092 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015)…cause the defendant was sentenced as an habitual offender, he was not entitled to be resen-tenced even though his scoresheet was improperly calculated and the trial court sentenced him at the miscalculated maximum guideline sentence); Horn v. State, 775 So. 2d 1007, 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (finding that “[w]e need not address th[at] claim [an incorrect calculation in his sentencing guidelines scoresheet] because defendant was sentenced as a habitual offender and the guidelines scoresheet is irrelevant”); McGee…
-
State v. Gross, 833 So. 2d 777 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)…alia, and proceeds would be found there. See Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. at 238, 103 S.Ct. 2317. The judge who issued the warrant “had a substantial basis for ... conclud[ing] that probable cause existed.” Id. (citation omitted); see Lopez v. State, 775 So. 2d 1007 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001); Baker v. State, 762 So. 2d 977 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000). IV. Relying on Gesell v. State, 751 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), the trial court ruled that the single inspection of trash at the new address was not sufficient to corrobor…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Mayes, 666 So. 2d 165 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)